We show that the terrestrial land and seafloor contain no volcano-tectonic mega landforms expressed in relief that could be similar in size to those identified on Mars, and could have analogous structure and origin to the giant landforms whose volumes of constituent rocks are (1-2.4) x 106 km3 (Alba Patera, Olympus Mons, Arsia Mons, Ascraeus Mons, Pavonis Mons, and Elysium Mons). No fragments or traces of similar features have ever been unambiguously identified and described in geological rock sequences, not only in Mesozoic and Cenozoic rock sequences, but also in those dating back to Paleozoic time. The same applies to the older epochs on Earth. Now the topographic constituent components of Martian mega landforms have the appearance of very magnified copies of well-known and repeatedly described terrestrial volcanic edifices, viz., dominantly shield-like and lava volcanoes, lava domes, as well as calderas of various types. However, the edifices of the above types of volcanoes are not identical with their Martian counterparts as to morphology, being shorter in height and having steeper slopes. The calderas are smaller by factors of multiple times. The Martian volcanic landforms are much older. There is a unique edifice, namely, Olympus Mons, a mega land-form that stands in a large glacier sheet and for whose origin glacial processes are also responsible. It is classified as belonging to the type of giant tuyas. Its mini analogues are glacial subaerial tuyas of different ages and parameters that have been subjected to glaciation in volcanic areas on Earth.

На основе данных дистанционного зондирования за период с 1999 по 2021 гг. определены этапы изменения активности кратерного озера вулкана Малый Семячик. Показано, что изменение цветовой палитры поверхности озера является следствием изменения химического состава воды.

This paper reconstructs, for the first time, the motion dynamics of an eruptive cloud formed during the catastrophic eruption of the Sheveluch volcano in November 1964 (Volcanic Explosivity Index 4+). This became possible due to the public availability of atmospheric reanalysis data from the ERA-40 archive of the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the development of numerical modeling of volcanic ash cloud propagation. The simulation of the eruptive cloud motion process, which was carried out using the FALL3D and PUFF models, made it possible to clarify the sequence of events of this eruption (destruction of extrusive domes in the crater and the formation of an eruptive column and pyroclastic flows), which lasted only 1 h 12 min. During the eruption, the ash cloud consisted of two parts: the main eruptive cloud that rose up to 15,000 m above sea level (a.s.l.), and the co-ignimbrite cloud that formed above the moving pyroclastic flows. The ashfall in Ust-Kamchatsk (Kamchatka) first occurred out of the eruptive cloud moving at a higher speed, then out of the co-ignimbrite cloud. In Nikolskoye (Bering Island, Commander Islands), ash fell only out of the co-ignimbrite cloud. Under the turbulent diffusion, the forefront of the main eruptive cloud rose slowly in the atmosphere and reached 16,500 m a.s.l. by 04:07 UTC on November 12. Three days after the eruption began, the eruptive cloud stretched for 3000 km over the territories of the countries of Russia, Canada, the USA, Mexico, and over both the Bering Sea and the Pacific Ocean. It is assumed that the well-known long-term decrease in the solar radiation intensity in the northern latitudes from 1963–1966, which was established according to the world remote sensing data, was associated with the spread of aerosol clouds formed not only by the Agung volcano, but those formed during the 1964 Sheveluch volcano catastrophic eruption

A conceptual model of the thermal and water recharge of the Ketkinsky geothermal field as a product of magma and water injection from the Koryaksky volcano located 24 km apart was proposed. A digital hydrogeological model of the Ketkinsky geothermal field was developed in the volume of 7 km x 5 km x 2.5 km (from the topographic surface), it includes the space drilled by exploration and production wells. The model is based on an analysis of 3D distributions of temperature, pressure, salinity and CH4 content, geometrization of productive faults and well productivity characteristics. The geofiltration space was zoned in the model with separation of
deep and shallow productive geothermal reservoirs, the area of deep thermal fluid upflow in the SSE part of the model base and the area of hidden thermal water discharge at the ground surface.
A natural state inversion iTOUGH2-EWASG simulation was performed to estimate the deep thermal water upflow and permeability of productive geothermal reservoirs. The deep thermal water upflow is estimated to be about 10 kg/s, the permeability is estimated to be 190 mD (shallow productive reservoir) and 35 mD (deep productive reservoir). Inverse iTOUGH2-EWASG modeling of the hydrodynamic operating history of 1989–2020 was used to estimate the compressibility of the productive geothermal reservoirs: the compressibility of the deep reservoir is estimated at 7.16E-10 Pa???? 1, the shallow reservoir at 4.14E-07 Pa???? 1. Direct iTOUGH2-EWASG modeling with the above parameters reproduces the history of salinity and temperature changes in production wells.
Forecast modeling of existing producing wells #23, K6, K01, K5 operation for 25 years with application of submersible pumps at immersion depth of 70 m confirms the possibility of their sustainable operation with total flow rate not less than 14.2 kg/s, adding four producing wells may yield to 54.3 kg/s with retaining of produced water quality (temperature, gas content of CH4, salinity).
The use of submersible pumps and reinjection can significantly increase the reserves of Ketkinsky field to 165–175 kg/s of 70–80 ◦C and 60–70 g/s of CH4. Additional increase in reserves may be obtained by drilling the already known thermal anomaly in the SSE sector of the field and in the SWW foothills of Koryaksky volcano.